Comments on: Sonar Time Machine : replaying the past http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/ Open Source Quality Management Platform Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Olivier Gaudin http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-680 Olivier Gaudin Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:36:01 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-680 Arun, this is not currently possible. Feel free to create a Jira issue for this good addition to current functionality. Arun, this is not currently possible. Feel free to create a Jira issue for this good addition to current functionality.

]]> By: Arun http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-679 Arun Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:56:46 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-679 Hi, Is it possible to get drilled down details from Time Machine. For Example: If we get a difference of 20 Rules violated between 2 snapshots, can we get the details over these 20 rules alone and not the entire list so that they can be addressed with high priority?. Hi,

Is it possible to get drilled down details from Time Machine. For Example: If we get a difference of 20 Rules violated between 2 snapshots, can we get the details over these 20 rules alone and not the entire list so that they can be addressed with high priority?.

]]> By: Olivier Gaudin http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-538 Olivier Gaudin Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:47:19 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-538 You are correct Bruno. We cannot really amend the article, otherwise feed reader will be notified, but your comment will act as an update :-) You are correct Bruno. We cannot really amend the article, otherwise feed reader will be notified, but your comment will act as an update :-)

]]> By: Bruno Vernay http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-537 Bruno Vernay Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:18:24 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-537 You should update the command line to the new format. mvn org.codehaus.sonar:sonar-maven-plugin:1.x:sonar -Dsonar.projectDate=2007-01-12 Should be mvn sonar:sonar -Dsonar.projectDate=2007-01-12 or I missed something. You should update the command line to the new format.

mvn org.codehaus.sonar:sonar-maven-plugin:1.x:sonar -Dsonar.projectDate=2007-01-12

Should be mvn sonar:sonar -Dsonar.projectDate=2007-01-12

or I missed something.

]]> By: Freddy Mallet http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-298 Freddy Mallet Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:49:28 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-298 Perhaps because you use Maven Cobertura version 2.2 with Java 6 ? (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-989). If this is not the case, please switch to the user mailing list. Perhaps because you use Maven Cobertura version 2.2 with Java 6 ? (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SONAR-989). If this is not the case, please switch to the user mailing list.

]]> By: Sam Edwards http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-297 Sam Edwards Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:11:52 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-297 We have taken snapshots about a month apart, and find that, for most of our code modules, we get reasonable Code Coverage percentages for the June 6 snapshot (anywhere between 30% and 60%), but for all snapshots since, we get 0% Code Coverage for almost all of the code modules we are tracking (about 30). The other Tests metrics (Unit tests duration, skipped unit tests, etc.) look fine for all snapshots. Can anybody explain why the Code Coverage percentages suddenly drop to 0? We have taken snapshots about a month apart, and find that, for most of our code modules, we get reasonable Code Coverage percentages for the June 6 snapshot (anywhere between 30% and 60%), but for all snapshots since, we get 0% Code Coverage for almost all of the code modules we are tracking (about 30). The other Tests metrics (Unit tests duration, skipped unit tests, etc.) look fine for all snapshots. Can anybody explain why the Code Coverage percentages suddenly drop to 0?

]]> By: Freddy Mallet http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-226 Freddy Mallet Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:57:50 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-226 Hi Newman, I'm not sure to understand what you mean by report. Please swith to the sonar user mailing list to get support. Freddy Hi Newman, I’m not sure to understand what you mean by report. Please swith to the sonar user mailing list to get support.
Freddy

]]> By: Newman http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-225 Newman Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:46:26 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-225 Hi Soanr is set for nightly build by enabling hudson "Do not run Sonar when the build is trigged by SCM changes." check box but please let me know when sonar will take the report or what is the right time to see sonar report. Is there is any configuration done in sonar to take the reports? Hi

Soanr is set for nightly build by enabling hudson “Do not run Sonar when the build is trigged by SCM changes.” check box but please let me know when sonar will take the report or what is the right time to see sonar report.
Is there is any configuration done in sonar to take the reports?

]]> By: Jeff bannister http://www.sonarsource.org/sonar-time-machine-replaying-the-past/comment-page-1/#comment-167 Jeff bannister Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:45:45 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=213#comment-167 Simply awesome! Simply awesome!

]]>