Comments on: Clean Up Design at Class Level with Sonar http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/ Open Source Quality Management Platform Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:52:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Raghu Semburakkiannan http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1220 Raghu Semburakkiannan Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:01:01 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3009#comment-1220 Really a good metrics and clearly helps in OOPs design principle. Yes, if Sonar gives less false-positive then its more wonderful. Really a good metrics and clearly helps in OOPs design principle. Yes, if Sonar gives less false-positive then its more wonderful.

]]> By: Chris http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1208 Chris Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:16:29 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3009#comment-1208 Avoiding false-positives in the algorithm is laudable, but I think there will always be times when human decisions on design trump all else. In those cases it will be nice to have annotations or some other mechanism to mark code that has been reviewed and accepted with the given metric rating, LCOM4 or other. LCOM4 is very useful. Great work! ,chris Avoiding false-positives in the algorithm is laudable, but I think there will always be times when human decisions on design trump all else. In those cases it will be nice to have annotations or some other mechanism to mark code that has been reviewed and accepted with the given metric rating, LCOM4 or other.

LCOM4 is very useful. Great work!
,chris

]]> By: Freddy Mallet http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1152 Freddy Mallet Sun, 20 Nov 2011 17:56:02 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3009#comment-1152 You're right Michael and that's a case I'm currently thinking about to automatically remove such false-positives. You’re right Michael and that’s a case I’m currently thinking about to automatically remove such false-positives.

]]> By: Michael http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-1146 Michael Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:18:32 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3009#comment-1146 Hello! But what about Abstract Factory pattern? We have a lot of unrelated methods in factory implementation and each Factory produces itself Product. Of course we will have big LCOM4. Don't you think so? Hello! But what about Abstract Factory pattern? We have a lot of unrelated methods in factory implementation and each Factory produces itself Product. Of course we will have big LCOM4. Don’t you think so?

]]> By: Freddy Mallet http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Freddy Mallet Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:39:23 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3009#comment-976 Hello, could you provide a simple java example to be sure to talk about the same thing ? I'd prefer having this discussion on the user Sonar mailing list : http://www.sonarsource.org/support/. Thanks Freddy Hello, could you provide a simple java example to be sure to talk about the same thing ? I’d prefer having this discussion on the user Sonar mailing list : http://www.sonarsource.org/support/.
Thanks
Freddy

]]> By: Telemaco http://www.sonarsource.org/clean-up-design-at-class-level-with-sonar/comment-page-1/#comment-972 Telemaco Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:32:15 +0000 http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=3009#comment-972 I'm not sure about this, but I think you should take into account methods inherited from an abstract class implemented in a specific class. The design problem, if any, is in the abstract class, not in the specific one. What do you think? I’m not sure about this, but I think you should take into account methods inherited from an abstract class implemented in a specific class. The design problem, if any, is in the abstract class, not in the specific one. What do you think?

]]>