<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond the tool, Sonar is a platform to manage code quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/</link>
	<description>Open Source Quality Management Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddy Malllet</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-1223</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddy Malllet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=1298#comment-1223</guid>
		<description>In fact parsing objective-c source code is not so easy and that&#039;s why we haven&#039;t yet started working on such plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact parsing objective-c source code is not so easy and that&#8217;s why we haven&#8217;t yet started working on such plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobibob</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>mobibob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=1298#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>When is the objective-c version scheduled?   That is a wide-open opportunity with a huge code base to meter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the objective-c version scheduled?   That is a wide-open opportunity with a huge code base to meter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Gaudin</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Gaudin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=1298#comment-255</guid>
		<description>The answer to your question depends on what you mean by version...

If you mean version as release, I would think that TimeMachine is exactly what you need. This will be soon be completed by SONAR-249 that will show evolution between now and pre-defined intervals.

If you mean comparing the trunk with a branch, then you can use the parameter -Dbranch to get both versions in Sonar.

Olivier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer to your question depends on what you mean by version&#8230;</p>
<p>If you mean version as release, I would think that TimeMachine is exactly what you need. This will be soon be completed by SONAR-249 that will show evolution between now and pre-defined intervals.</p>
<p>If you mean comparing the trunk with a branch, then you can use the parameter -Dbranch to get both versions in Sonar.</p>
<p>Olivier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william el kaim</title>
		<link>http://www.sonarsource.org/beyond-the-tool-sonar-is-a-platform-to-manage-code-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>william el kaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonar.codehaus.org/?p=1298#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Sonar is a great tool and I&#039;m pushing all our dev teams to use it.
What is still missing for me to make it perfect for my needs is the capability to compare two distinct versions. Trends are great but can be misleading.
Is there any work forecasted to answer this need?

Anyway, I want to thank you for this excellent product and for its quality (very stable).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sonar is a great tool and I&#8217;m pushing all our dev teams to use it.<br />
What is still missing for me to make it perfect for my needs is the capability to compare two distinct versions. Trends are great but can be misleading.<br />
Is there any work forecasted to answer this need?</p>
<p>Anyway, I want to thank you for this excellent product and for its quality (very stable).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

